Physics 164: Semester II Physics Lab
Fall Semester, 2008
Content of the Course
This laboratory course will cover topics pertaining to electricity,
magnetism, and optics. Goal: to witness some of the laws and equations of physics
"in action." In this course, we will not be "verifying" these laws;
they've been tested for hundreds of years and seem pretty sound. Instead, we
will concentrate on making connections between what you observe in the lab
and the theoretical concepts and equations discussed in lecture and in the
textbook.
Prerequisites: Physics 153 or equivalent, with lab, &
concurrent enrollment in Physics 154.
Schedule of Laboratory Topics
| Week of September 8 |
No Labs |
| Week of September 15 |
Geometrical optics
|
| Week of September 22 |
Polarized Light
|
| Week of September 29 |
Thin Lenses |
| Week of October 6 |
(Introduction to) Electrical Instrumentation AND
DC Circuits (2 units) |
| Week of October 13 |
Quiz #1 |
| Week of October 20 |
No labs (fall break) |
| Week of October 27 |
Electric field and electric potentials |
| Week of November 3 |
Kirchhoff's Laws |
| Week of November 10 |
Electromagnetic Induction |
| Week of November 17 |
Diffraction and Interference of Light |
| Week of November 24 |
No labs (Thanksgiving break) |
| Week of December 1 |
Atomic Spectra |
| Week of December 8 |
Quiz #2 |
| Week of December 15 |
Final exam week - no labs |
Instructors:
Dr. William Greenwood
Office: Rieke 203
Email: greenwwg@plu.edu
Phone: 535-7540
Dr. Steve Starkovich
Office: Rieke 251
Email: starkosp@plu.edu
Phone: 535-7542
Lab Reports and Evaluation
- Each student must keep a bound lab notebook, preferably one with
at least some gridded pages. A suitable notebook is available in the Bookstore.
- Each lab report is to be written in the lab notebook and should contain
a brief summary of the purpose of the lab, as well as clearly marked tables,
calculations and sketches that summarize the data, conclusions and configuration
of the experiment. If data sheets are included with the laboratory instructions,
they should be completed and attached to the lab notebook. Your notebook should
be complete enough that a knowledgeable reader would be able to replicate
your experiment based upon the written account you provide in your notebook.
- Two quizzes will be given during the semester on the dates shown in the
Schedule of Laboratory Topics. Note that you may NOT use the department-issued
laboratory manual during these quizzes, though you will be permitted to refer
to your lab notebook. Therefore, it's especially important that your reports
be clear enough for you to extract information from them during the quizzes.
- Your weekly lab exercise will be successfully completed when your lab report
meets the approval of your lab instructor. If so, your lab instructor will
record your lab as having been completed, and you then are free to leave the
lab. If your instructor does not give his/her approval of your report, you
must continue working on the lab until it meets your instructor's approval.
A STUDENT WHO LEAVES THE LAB WITHOUT OBTAINING THE INSTRUCTOR'S APPROVAL OF
HIS/HER LAB REPORT WILL NOT RECEIVE CREDIT FOR THE LAB.
- A student who successfully completes all the labs will be assured of a grade
of at least a "C" for the course. (A student with one or more
incomplete labs will receive a lower grade in a manner to be determined by
the instructor.) Performance on the laboratory quizzes will provide the primary
basis for assignment of grades higher than C. Also, at the discretion of the
instructor, you may be asked to turn in your lab notebook at the end of the
semester. The quality of the notebook may be used as a grade bump in borderline
cases.
- A student may not attend another lab section without the approval of the
instructor of that section. That instructor must report the student's completion
of the lab to the student's regular lab instructor before the student will
receive credit for the lab.
Guidelines/hints for your lab notebook
When deciding what you should write in your lab book and how you should write
it, the basis for judgment is utility. The first reason to keep a scientific
notebook is to keep track of what you've done, so you don't have to waste time
repeating yourself. Your record should be complete enough so that you can still
understand what you've done if you were to look at your work six months later
- or six weeks later, during your lab quiz.
- Don't cram everything into a small area on the page. Spread your writing
and drawing out a little.
- Be complete, but not verbose. Complete sentences not necessary. Well-labeled
drawings and sketches are often effective.
- Label everything adequately. This includes titling the lab, as well as calculations,
tables of data, drawings, graphs, analyses, etc.
In the professional world, your work will probably be challenged; you will
be asked to justify your conclusions or interpretations. Your lab notebook (or
equivalent) will be your best instrument for defense. Therefore, it should contain
enough information to respond to the skeptic (e.g., your thesis supervisor or
your project manager) who asks:
- What apparatus did you use?
- What data did you take and how did you take it?
- How good/reliable are your data? What is your experimental precision, and
how did you estimate or measure it?
- Why did you take that data? How do (or did) you plan to transform that data
in order to get your final result?
In addition to these topics, lab books often contain the first preparatory
steps toward the interpretation and publication of the results. Your lab book
will also serve as a lab report, so it should also contain a brief presentation
of your results, the analysis necessary to extract the results from the data,
and the conclusions that you can draw from the experiment. The report will usually
include all or most of the following items:
- Completely labeled graphs and tables of raw and derived data values.
- A record of how the raw data were used in calculations of other numbers.
- A record of how the uncertainties in the various results were determined.
- Reasons why you should have confidence in the results. These reasons usually
are in the form of cross-checks; either with previous experimental results,
from independent sources or theoretical calculations.